
The just-world hypothesis is the belief that people generally get what they deserve — that the world is fundamentally fair and outcomes are proportionate to virtue, effort, or character.
Believing the world is just reduces existential anxiety. If bad things happen to people who deserve them, then good people (like you) are protected. The alternative — that suffering is random — is deeply unsettling.
Just-world thinking leads to victim blaming — the psychological need to find what a victim did to deserve their outcome, in order to maintain the belief that the world is fair.
Just-world bias is a significant driver of opposition to redistribution and social safety nets — if people earned their outcomes, intervention seems undeserved. Research consistently shows this link.
Reference: