
The decoy effect (asymmetric dominance effect) is when the presence of a third, inferior option makes one of the original two options more attractive — even though the decoy itself would never be chosen.
The Economist once offered subscriptions: web-only ($59), print-only ($125), or web + print ($125). The print-only option was the decoy. Almost nobody chose it — but its presence drove 84% of buyers to the combo vs. 32% when the decoy was removed.
The decoy is dominated by one option (clearly worse) but comparable to another. Its presence makes the non-dominated option look like an obvious winner by comparison — shifting the relative evaluation.
Evaluate each option on its own merits before comparing. The existence of a bad option tells you nothing about the value of the others.
Reference: